Do you remember when the Joker made jokes? At this point, I barely do.
Last week, in preparation for watching and reviewing “Joker: Folie à Deux,” I finally bit the bullet and watched the first “Joker.” Despite being a lifelong comics reader and fond enough of Batman-related properties (though I’ve always been more of a Superman guy), I’d put off watching “Joker” because, well, because of the people who liked it.
“Joker” became a bit of an incel holy text, skyrocketing to popularity as a movie that otherwise amounts to very little outside of one nice performance and some faux-arthouse plot beats ripped from Martin Scorsese films.
I do not like the first “Joker.” However, when early reviews started coming in for “Joker: Folie à Deux,” many of the incel Joker-ites who so adored the original labeled the sequel an unfaithful rug-pull that condemns both its protagonist and fans of the first film. This piqued my interest. If “Joker” fans don’t like “Joker: Folie à Deux,” and I don’t like “Joker,” I'd probably like “Folie à Deux,” right? Wrong. “Folie à Deux” is a complete dumpster fire in almost every direction.
The film has a plain and simple ground-floor tone problem. Since the first “Joker” was so entrenched in being an homage to — or a rip-off — of Scorsese’s films (notably “Taxi Driver” and “The King of Comedy”), the sequel is mired in an aesthetic established to uphold those stories without the stories there to fill it in. This leaves the film listless and disjointed before it even begins.
And when it does begin … does it even begin? Does anything happen in this movie? Nothing that happens to the Joker in this movie matters until the abrupt ending, which could have happened just as abruptly in the first 10 minutes. Hell, it could’ve happened at the end of the last movie. At least then I’d have two hours of my life back.
Then, unfortunately, there is the Joker himself. I have never wanted Batman to be in a movie more just so someone could beat the stuffing out of this wet blanket. I mean, say what you will about the first movie, but at least the character himself is entertaining in that one. At least he does stuff. The Joker probably wore his clown makeup for 20 minutes of this 138-minute movie. It’s a two-hour whimper with no actual payoff.
I haven’t even mentioned Harley Quinn — if I can even call her Harley Quinn. This movie definitely didn’t. Harley was hardly in the movie. Outside of the musical sequences, which, admittedly are very well-done (breaking news: Lady Gaga can sing) — Harley's character is utterly wasted, and goes essentially nowhere.
Then, there's the “main message” of the movie. And what a message it is.