The North Carolina General Assembly's new legislative voting district maps are awaiting approval from a three-judge panel.
The redrawn districts, if approved, would replace 2011 maps, which were shot down by a U.S. District Court for racial gerrymandering in 28 districts: 19 in the House and 9 in the Senate.
Graig Meyer, D-Orange, thinks the new maps are just as bad, if not worse, than the old ones.
“The courts threw out their old maps for being racially gerrymandered," Meyer said. "And instead of drawing more fair and representative maps, they drew maps that will either maintain their majorities or possibly give them a chance to increase their majorities."
After old maps were rejected, the state was given a court-ordered deadline to come up with new districting plans by Sept. 1, which it complied with Aug. 25.
The panel will now rule whether or not the new maps are constitutional. If not, the judges will be able to redraw the maps themselves.
All of this comes less than six weeks before the U.S. Supreme Court hears North Carolina’s argument on the role of partisanship in redrawing political districts.
Meyer feels that state Republicans are attempting to take advantage of a loophole in the nation's court system.
“Until (the Supreme Court case) happens, Republicans are trying to take advantage of the wiggle room in the law while they still can,” Meyer said.