Professors from almost every department at UNC signed a letter sent to Chancellor Carol Folt and Provost Bob Blouin demanding leadership and answers regarding the removal of Silent Sam. According to Professor Edwin Fisher of the UNC’s Gillings School of Global Public Health, as of Thursday night, over 320 signatures had been procured.
The letter, dated Aug. 25, 2018, came five days after Silent Sam was forcibly removed by protesters. It recounts how last year, university administrators failed to firmly address how the statue has been the root of divisiveness and public concern.
According to Fisher, who coordinated the email, the growing response from UNC faculty has been “remarkable.” Fisher explained that after sending the email to others in the Health Behavior Department regarding his sentiments toward Silent Sam’s removal, he was encouraged to circulate it through other departments to gather response and support.
Distinguished professors ranging from the Department of Mathematics to Department of Dramatic Art, along with several who had served the Dean themselves, were among the list of signees.
“We need a vision from Carol Folt,” Fisher said, urging the Chancellor to “not play some kind of rhetorical dance with the UNC-system Board of Governors.”
Folt met with the Board of Trustees on Tuesday to discuss Silent Sam's future. The administration was given a Nov. 15 deadline to present a plan to the Board of Governors.
“We will look at all options, including one that features a location on campus to display the monument in a place of prominence, honor, visibility, availability and access, where we can ensure public safety, ensure the monument’s preservation and place in the history of UNC and the nation while also following appropriate processes to secure any needed approvals from the Board of Trustees, the Board of Governors, the N.C. Historical Commission and the North Carolina General Assembly,” one of Folt's most recent statements said.
"The time is now for the university administration to show leadership, not bureaucratic obfuscation," the letter said. "Show us that you and the university do indeed stand for Lux et Libertas, not sustaining and and enforcing the symbols of human cruelty."
The letter addressed the administration's insistence that safety is a top priority.